The implementation of political correctness has led to the demonisation of factual evidence, and the acceptance of ideological concepts that deny logic and cannot be verified via the scientific method.
The concept of political correctness has caused the act of citing any form of factual evidence about certain demographics (IE. Women, African-Americans, Australian Aboriginals, Homosexuals) as a form of 'bigotry'. This had led to the legislation of MANY laws that offer a large amount of rights and privileges to certain demographics, while the rest of the populace are treated in a far more harsh and oppressive manner (IE. Violence Against Women Act, Affirmative Action, Sexual Harassment Laws, Divorce Laws, Spousal Support, etc).
The Correlation Between Socialism and Feminism
Socialist ideology is based on the belief that the state should collect the money that is earned by the hardest workers, and distribute it to those who are unable or refuse to work. Feminism is a derivation of socialist-Marxist ideology, and believes that the money that is earned by men should be collected by the state, and distributed to the women of society.
The rise of socialism in the 19th Century led to the hosting of a Women's Rights Convention at Seneca Falls, New York, USA in 1848, where an assemblage of socialist-indoctrinated women formed a new movement known as *feminism*. The founding feminists were avid supporters of socialism, and believed that they were entitled to the same rights as men.
The Contradictory and Bigoted Ideologies of Feminism
As the decades passed, the feminist movement began to grow and diverge into an assemblage of illogical hypocrites, who believed that women should be able to retain the legal impunity that they received under Old English Law, however they also wished to obtain the same rights as men. The Old English Law System did not allow the women to enjoy the full spectrum of rights, so the women were given a large degree of legal impunity.
During the 20th Century, the feminists began to label the concept of logic as a form of Female Oppression, however they were angered by the sentiment that women were far too emotional to succeed as leaders.
Linda Gardiner, an editor of the Women's Review of Books tried to downplay the importance of logic and mathematics as a form of rationality:
"We might begin to question the import of Descartes' (Rene Descartes) stress on logic and mathematics as the ideal types of rationality," explained Linda Gardiner, editor of the Women's Review of Books.
The state of New Jersey sponsored a program known as The New Jersey Project, which tries to declare the concepts of knowledge and scientific inquiry as the male perpetrated 'rape of nature'.
Elizabeth Fee stated the following:
"Nature was female, and knowledge was created as an act of aggression--a passive nature had to be interrogated, unclothed, penetrated, and compelled by man to reveal her secrets." - Elizabeth Fee
(http://www.mises.org/fipandol/isec1.asp)
Scientific testing has shown that the anatomical differences between the male and female brain led to the sexes thinking differently to each other, however the modern feminists such as Nancy Hopkins are angered by the suggestion that the intellectual aptitude of a person is determined by their sex.
The feminists believe that the sexes are the same, however they try to claim that women are morally superior to men; even though the majority of child abuse is perpetrated by women.
Old English Law
Under the Old English Law System, the men were required to take accountability for the misbehaviour that was performed by their wives, and this meant a woman could spend her husband's money, and HE would be the party that was forced to spend time in Debtors' Prison.
The act of woman-battering was prohibited under Old English Law, however the men were allowed to chastise their wives in a non-violent manner, as the men were held responsible for any evil deed that their wives happened to perform.
Women's Rights and Privilege
Prior to the industrialised revolution, the women were not interested in obtaining the same rights and responsibilities that were held upon the men, as the work in general was extremely hazardous and physically demanding. Even during the early stages of feminism, the women were unwilling to participate in the hazardous and physically demanding fields that were required to sustain an industrialised society. The very same attitude is held by the current generation of females, as 24 out of the 25 most physically demanding and hazardous industries are dominated by male employees, and as a result around 93% of persons who die while working happing to be male. The feminists are only willing to obtain the rights that do not come with responsiblities.
Conclusion
The presence of political correctness and the contradictory nature of feminist ideology has led to the implementation of an abundance of illogical concepts and laws that are intended to demonise and oppress the male populace (IE. Domestic Violence Laws, Child Support Laws, Child Custody Laws, Affirmative Action, Divorce Laws, Sexual Harassment Laws).
