A feminist known as Catharine MacKinnon recently made a VERY fallacious, unsubstantiated, and fascist statement which was meant to produce mass hysteria and gain support for feminism. The unsubstantiated and fallacious statement that Catharine MacKinnon made tried to suggest the following:
- That there is a “War On Women” in existence, in which males are the aggressors and females are the victims.
- Males are carefully planning terrorist-like attacks on women, in which they are targeting female civilians and are driven by ideology.
- Gang rape, pornography and other acts which are meant to humiliate and repress women are carefully organised by males, in which the victims happen to be civilians, and the misogynist attitude that is presented is as ideological as Islamic fundamentalism.
Catharine MacKinnon also stated the following:
“Aggression against women isn’t called the violation of peace, as aggression against nation-states is called,” she said. “There’s no Geneva Convention for this war, and the domestic criminal laws are so under-enforced that they can be considered not there.” Stated By Catharine MacKinnon
There is not a shred of evidence to support the claims that Catharine MacKinnon had made, in fact there is an overwhelming amount of evidence which proves that the claims Catharine MacKinnon made are fallacious, unsubstantiated and illogical.
Let’s look at the following statistics:
As for the law system, the laws are designed to give females MORE rights than males. For example, domestic violence laws are designed to give impunity to females. The Primary Aggressor Law basically states that an arrest cannot be determined by who initiated and inflicted the most violence. Instead the arrest can ONLY be based upon who the Law Enforcement Officer at the scene believes is the larger threat.
The Law Enforcement Officer usually determines this based on who is the physically larger person, which is most often the male. As a result, the female can be the initiator of the violence, and she may have inflicted the vast majority of injuries between the 2 persons, yet the male can be the one who is arrested. This law was passed due to strong feminist protesting in 1997.
Bill 117 states that if a female makes an accusation that her spouse assaulted her, he will be placed in jail for 24 hours. During that time his assets are frozen and his spouse can claim his assets, and when he is released from jail 24 hours later he may no longer own his house or any of his possessions. The female does not need to prove her accusation is true, and the police are required to perform the arrest based solely on the fact the female made the complaint. http://www.mens-rights.net/law/violence.htm
Divorce courts give impunity to unfaithful and abusive females, by rewarding such women with alimony/child support and more often than not, the house. During a divorce, a female is entitled to make false accusations of sexual abuse or domestic violence and even if her accusations are proven to be false, she is given impunity.
Such accusations are used to prolong the case in order so that the judge declares the case as being of "no result", and therefore hands custody of the children to the mother. In fact lawyers encourage females to perform this tactic during divorce. http://www.mens-rights.net/law/divorce.htm
Female employees who make false accusations of sexual harassment are given impunity and are rewarded for their actions when their accusation is proven to be false. http://www.mens-rights.net/law/harassment.htm
Females who commit paternity fraud are given impunity. In fact if a male obtains a DNA test proving he is not the biological father of the child he is paying child support for, he STILL has to continue paying child support otherwise he is placed in jail. http://www.mens-rights.net/law/paternityfraud.htm
Females who REFUSE to pay child support are given impunity while males who are unable to pay child support due to living in poverty are placed in jail. http://www.mens-rights.net/law/support.htm
As you can see, Catharine MacKinnon’s claims are fallacious and unsubstantiated.
Throughout history there has been a long list of attention seeking bigots who have tried to obtain attention and fame, which they perform by making fallacious, unsubstantiated and absurd statements that are meant to produce mass hysteria among the public. Such persons can be described as being fascists who use thuggish tactics to control a civilisation.
The most successful fascists from the 20th century were the Radical Feminists, Islamic Extremists and German Nazi’s. While the German Nazis were defeated during WWII, both the Radical Feminists and Islamic Extremists are still in existence.
The German Nazis and Radial Feminists gained power over their civilisations by spreading corrupt, fallacious and unsubstantiated statements that were meant to produce mass hysteria among the people. In other words, they made it appear as if they were working in the best interests of society, while hiding their secret agenda which was to have absolute power over society.
Adolf Hitler realised this and made the following quote in 1943:
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."
Feminist indoctrination has tried to justify the oppression of males by stating it is in the best interests of the children. Such indoctrination was essential in allowing feminism to gain enough power to take control over the Family Court. After taking control of the Family Court, feminist influence has allowed the passing of various anti-male laws which are designed to oppress males by taking away their rights and relegating them to being a slave of the system.
